ss_blog_claim=5f03e3e7fa6ca8c951b6fbd30fa71c10 Nikeplatz? | beyondmadisonavenue

Nikeplatz?

In September 2003 the news went out nationwide: "Karlsplatz, one of
Vienna’s main squares, is soon to be renamed Nikeplatz. Apart from the
new name, it appears that a huge monument in the shape of Nike’s famous
“Swoosh” logo will be built in Nikeplatz." Needless to say, it was all
fake. The one-month campaign provoked the reactions of Vienna’s
citizens, city officials and, of course, the Nike group, which denied
any involvement and started legal action to put an end to the bizarre
performance. This almost unbelievable prank is the work of the artist
duo known  as 0100101110101101.ORG, who this time tricked an entire
city: Vienna.

Wow.  Talk about a moment for a brand to make a decision.  Nike filed a formal injunction against the organization who, in turn, ignored said injunction.  In the end…Nike folded and allowed the demonstration to continue to its conclusion.  The real question:  does Nike placate alarmed citizens by trying to squash the demonstration, or do they embrace it as a moment of brand strength?  They chose to try to squash it (and failed).  Maybe the middle ground is the best answer?

Read more here.

[via]
 

Technorati Tags: , , , ,


One Response to “Nikeplatz?”

  1. How brands embrace or respond to these types of events is interesting, no?  What does/should a brand do when someone creates a "fake" logo?  Or a spoof ad?  Or in this case, an anti-brand initiative just to create public unrest/outrage?

    Love these times!  And the 010(etc) guys rock.
     

Leave a Reply