PETA continues its "I’d rather go naked than wear fur" endeavor with a new campaign that resembles a Playboy cover and early ’90’s movie poster mashup.  Go figure, it even features a Playboy model.

"An international cover model, actor, and spokesperson for Dollhouse Clothing, sexy supermodel Joanna Krupa is known for her famous photo shoots, but there’s one thing Joanna would never model: fur. The Polish-born beauty, who has graced the covers of many magazines—including Playboy, Maxim, FHM, and Stuff—laid her convictions bare, so to speak, by baring all in PETA´s latest and raciest “I’d Rather Go Naked Than Wear Fur” ad. And to top it off, she posed in not one but three versions of the sexy ad!"

PETA.  I’m not impressed.  She’s a hot model (in that playboy/maxim over-airbrushed cheap "I’m selling my looks" kind of way) standing around naked.  WOW!  I’VE NEVER SEEN THAT BEFORE!.  From you or anyone else.  And the execution is horrible.  I’m pretty damn bored with your feeble attempt at shock value to make your point.  Are naked/near-naked women actually helping your cause?  Or have we escalated from bikini-clad Santa-girl to completely nude Maxim chick because you’re grasping at straws?

Read more about the campaign if you really want to.  Oh, and you can register for a poster-sized copy of the ad.  Go get’em college boys.

I’m starting to wonder why I even post these PETA things anymore.  They’re all the same…"Breaking news!  PETA exploits scantily clad women in an attempt to save animals!".  Should we even bother with these any more?

Technorati Tags: naked women, PETA, boring advertising, animal rights, fur